Getting Better All the Time

February 15, 2009

I don’t know about you, but I am so over the doom and gloom.  The only way we can turn this around is to start looking at the world with our glass half full.  I don’t mean we should live in denial. Yes, we do have a serious situation.  My pitch is to look for the positive as often as we are barraged by the negative.

Let’s focus on the encouraging signs both in the economy and in the local housing market.  For the economy, retail sales were up 1 % over last January, numbers for those filing for unemployment were down over the previous week, and Congress approved the President’s stimulus bill.  The stimulus bill contains provisions that are directly aimed at improving the housing market. The good news for us locally is that the former limits for conforming loans are back. That means the new limits for 7 out of the 9 Bay Area counties will return to $729,750.  That is over a $100,000 increase in the existing limit. This will allow more home buyers to access reasonable interest rates and have an easier time qualifying.  The original bill tried to raise the tax credit for first-time home buyers from $7500 to $15,000.  That provision didn’t make it, however the credit was raised to $8,000 and eliminated the payback provision. It also included over $50 billion for foreclosure mitigation. Combined with Treasury Secretary Geithner’s plan to deal with the banks, these provisions should bring more credit into the market for homes and slow the rate of foreclosures. All of these moves are aimed at stabilizing real estate values to create a more normalized market. 

On the local front, the lower end price ranges are still dominating the majority of sales; however we are beginning to see a new trend.  I spoke of the $4.4 million SF listing in my last report that sold quickly with two offers. Since that time, we have had a number of homes between $3-6 million go into escrow—a $6 million Tiburon home, a $3.2 Belvedere home, a $4.5 million and a $3.5 million SF home, and a $3.4 million home in Piedmont. This is the most activity in this price range we have seen in many months.  Three of these sales were of properties that have been on the market for a number of months and have undergone price reductions. I believe sellers are coming to the realization that the market has changed and therefore becoming more realistic in their expectations.  Conversely, buyers in this price range are negotiating transactions that they feel are of exceptional value.

We are just beginning to see more activity in the $1-3 million price range.  A good indicator is the $1.295 million home in the Upper Rockridge area of Oakland that received 6 offers. It was aggressively priced and showed extremely well.  The buyers responded strongly to the value. What it tells us about the market is that there is pent up demand, but it is only exercising itself when all the ingredients are present.

Another trend is that agents are making offers on listings that have either been taken off the market or have expired.  We had two cases in Sonoma where offers were presented on expired listings and both are now in escrow.  I think this is occurring for two reasons. First, in certain price ranges there is a dearth of listings and second, sellers have become more reasonable in what they would receive for their properties.

The closer buyers and sellers expectations align, the healthier the real estate market will become.

Entry Filed under: Goldman Report. .

17 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Teresa Callan  |  February 15, 2009 at 2:51 PM

    I agree. There is a lot more activity. I had 2 brokers tours and one weekend open house; had 2 offers on a property that was listed at $1,150,000. As I was driving home thinking that I was so lucky to be ratified I had another agent call saying her clients wanted to write. When I spoke to my pal at the title co he said that he was seeing a lot more orders coming in.
    Take it one day at a time,
    Teresa

  • 2. Eileen Bermingham  |  February 15, 2009 at 3:06 PM

    I am midway through my South of Market listing’s open house (price is $714,000) and I have had five parties through–all serious buyers. That’s despite the rain & holiday weekend. The SF market isn’t dead!

  • 3. Anne Petersen  |  February 15, 2009 at 9:15 PM

    My Seller was very happy to recieve an offer after her listing expired, even though it was substantially under the last asking price. She knew she would have to come down anyway when she came back on the market, so to get an offer out of the blue was welcome. Lesson: search the expireds if your Buyer doesn’t see what they want in the active listings!

  • 4. avigee  |  February 15, 2009 at 9:28 PM

    Ann thanks for sharing the details on why your seller was ready to accept an offer under her last asking price. Also the lesson for other realtors on expireds.

  • 5. avigee  |  February 15, 2009 at 9:30 PM

    Teresa good to hear that you are seeing the same pick up that we are seeing in some markets. The momentum is picking up.

  • 6. arvada darnell  |  February 15, 2009 at 10:22 PM

    I think that there are many positives to focus on….someone has to do that….why not us?

  • 7. Lee Ann Monfredini  |  February 15, 2009 at 10:50 PM

    I completely agree- I took out of town buyers out touring today and we were elbow to elbow with other buyers with agents- also got two calls to show our listing at the Lombardia tomorrow afternoon. I think the San Francisco market is showing definite signs of improvement.

  • 8. Tom Carlson  |  February 16, 2009 at 9:45 AM

    I just read in the SF Chronicle Sunday real estate section that the fees/points on Fannie and Freddie loans are supposed to go up to almost double-even for buyers with good credit on April 1, 2009. A larger down payment (on condos) many also be required. The stimus passing is great news but these fees and tougher qualifying guidelines will negate some of the stimulus incentives for home buyers. What is your take on this?

  • 9. Rob Regan  |  February 16, 2009 at 9:48 AM

    has anyone heard the details on the Sunset home’s auction… the auction was scheduled 3 days after the home hit the MLS priced at $349k. I heard but haven’t confirmed that at the appointed time 300 people showed up with a 135 pre-approval letters (the listing asked for buyers to show up pre-approved and with a blank CAR contract) and the home sold for $775,000.

    A quick (and I mean real quick) review of the comps seems to indicate that is a ver healthy number for the home. I’d love more details if anyone was there… but it sure does point to pent up demand if 135 pre-approved buyers show up with only 3 days notice.

  • 10. Rob Regan  |  February 16, 2009 at 9:49 AM

    I should clarify, I heard it sold for $775k but have not verified that

  • 11. Ashley  |  February 16, 2009 at 10:13 AM

    Another positive that I’ve noticed and been focusing on . . . pocket listings. There are a lot of agents that have a number of clients interested in selling, but not wanting to put the home on the market. Although not typically marketed by that agent, those pocket listings ARE out there. Put calls into agents and let them know your buyer needs. You’d be surprised at how many calls you’ll get.

  • 12. avigee  |  February 16, 2009 at 11:17 AM

    You are correct Tom for the regular Fannie and Freddie conforming loans that is the case. There are several groups lobbying Washington to deal with making some sense of it. It is almost like the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing. The Stimulus Bill is trying to improve the housing market and these new rules taking it away. I think over time, just like the return of the higher loan amounts for confirming loans, it will be dealt with. With that said, FHA loans are a great alternative. Buyers can get in with as little as 3-5% down and the qualifying is more generous. There are increased points, but sellers can credit buyers for the extra points. The loan market is a moving target—stay tuned, I think that Washington will get a handle on what is working to improve the housing market.

  • 13. avigee  |  February 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM

    Great example Rob. That demand is only building.

  • [...] Goldman, CEO of Pacific Union, posts recently that things are getting better all the time. I still hear about multiple offers on well priced homes. That is the key, a realistic seller and a [...]

  • 15. Caroline Nelson  |  February 17, 2009 at 12:44 AM

    I too am over the gloom and doom! There are still some way overpriced listings out there but I do think that we’ll see many well priced and prepared new listings this Spring. There is certainly pent up buyer demand, but the buyers are still waiting on the sidelines, waiting for the signal to jump in – what will it be??

  • 16. Eric Smith  |  February 21, 2009 at 9:36 AM

    “All of these moves are aimed at stabilizing real estate values to create a more normalized market.”

    Respectfully, if a more normalized market is one that is reliant on government handouts (FHA 3% loans, and conforming loans backed by the USA via Fannie and Freddie) then that can not be a normal market. When it becomes the case that in order to purchase a home you will need 20% down for a 30 year fixed, that will be a normal environment.

    It is interesting comparing the Canadian experience of home buying to ours, it requires a 20% down payment as standard, you cannot deduct the interest from your income and the loans are all recourse, yet home ownership in canada is ~68%. But then home ownership in Canada is a place to live and not an investment.

    Best

    Eric

  • 17. avigee  |  February 21, 2009 at 9:27 PM

    Eric,
    Excellent points. We have had 90% loans for many years before the zero down sub-prime loans that lead to the current fiasco. Those 90% loans and FHA loans in the past have not lead to abnormal foreclosure rates. It was the shaky qualifying and the no doc. loans that lead to much of our current problems. Unfortunatley what happens in every down cycle is the pendulum swings so that banks make qualifying very diffiuclt whether it be the borrower or the property. In today’s market, particularly with jumbo loans, banks are demanding more than 20% down. What we need to do is to get back to a normalized qualifying. In the lower end prices have dropped substantially so that 15-20% down is possible or even the 90-10-10 loans of the past would make sense. That is the kind of market I would like to return to. A home should be a home first. Believe it or not Canada is having its own problems, but not quite as severe.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Feeds

Blogroll

Resource Links

Recent Posts

Archives